Report based on the timeline is still under construction. Please wait for a
little more.
We have received supports from many concerned people, and all members at the
shelter appreciate them so much.
We actually made our minds to protect dogs because of one phone call in the
morning on October 11th.
On the day before we visited the shelter for the first time, and we just
started to make the list of dogs.
Shelter was filled with odor from the waste and no facilities were
constructed to suit dogfs habits.
Huskies started barking as soon as they saw human.
The howling-like@ cry of wretched dogs poked my ears.
One dog who seemed to be in a pretty bad condition was insanely howling.
That husky was suffering from piles, and seemed very severe.
In the shelter, two full-time employed caretakers watched dogfs health
condition.
We approached to that dog (called Mark), pat him and said,
g Hang on for a little bit more. Wefll save you very soon. Please hang
on.h
The phone call in the morning was from the owner of the dogs at that time.
He said, g Mark died. Itfs hopeless.h
He sounded like Mark died due to lack of protection.
In fact, after I left the shelter, I kept thinking if his howling and
unusual behavior indicated some urgent situation.
Markfs death crushed me and gave me a shock.
I was so overwhelmed with the feeling of repentance that no words came out
of my mouth.
When I realized, I was just apologizing on the phone.
The apology was not for the owners.
But it was to Mark who just passed away.
It was a fact that we let that situation pass.
Maybe he could be cured if we took him to the veterinarian at that moment.
His death stabbed our heart.
That was the moment when we seriously made up our mind to get involved with
the situation.
I promised to myself, g I will never let any one of these dogs pass away.
Ever.h
Without his death, we probably withdrew from the situation after recognizing
other organizations activities.
When we first talked with a dogsf owner, he said to me,
g A president who was also an financier deserted us because of the bad
loans. I have been assigned to handle remaining tasks since October 1st.
Now I own about 200 dogs, but I am considering closing the store soon and
clear all of them away. However, the issue canft be done in a day or two
since there still is a problem of employeesf wage. Because of our
financial situation, there is no time for me to provide care for the dogs.
I am looking for a place where dogs can be protected. I think dogs in the
mountain shelter will be first given care, then eventually all the dogs will
be protected.h
He also noted that the store probably would be closed on around October
20th.
We requested him an agreement with out policies of protection and to sign
the document.
By that time, there were only 10 days left until the store closes.
We hurriedly started making a list of the dogs.
When we first attended the shelter care, dogs were fed with large bags of
dog food, which were sold on sale at the home center.
Besides those bags, there were also other bags of dog food in the corner of
the room.
I assumed that dog food was supplied sufficiently.
According to the story of full-time employed caretakers, those dog foods
were sent to support the store.
However, the contents were all moldy and could not be given to the dogs.
In the situation when there are no foods, they had no choice but to feed
dogs with the moldy food.
As a result, dogs started to have diarrhea and bloody feces, and after all
no food could be given.
They told us that now they feed dogs with the cheap bags of food from the
home center at their own expense.
They also said that lives of these dogs couldnft be substituted with money
even if their wages are unpaid.
Since then, we started to go to the shelter with dog food.
We also asked some members on the mailing list to send any dog food left
over at their home.
Plenty of dog foods were sent to us one after another from on-line members
that I didnft expect to be so many.
Letters were attached to each food, saying g This is what I can do for now
since I canft attend the care.
Those on-line members cooperated with us to collect more information helpful
for our project.
Now I wonder if the owner could financially support the care.
He was actually marketing the pet shop by placing print ad inserts on the
local newspaper at the time we started the care.
Maybe we were simply used.
But it was a reality that the owner made unpaid-employees provide food at
their expense instead of his.
In the first 2 to 3 days, we completed taking picture of all the dogs, and
members who could not participate in the actual care finished the list of
them.
Meanwhile, we continued to take care of dogs and collect information.
To change the inhumane air filled in the shelter,
Environment started to improve little by little.
We placed an utmost importance on saving the lives of dogs suffering just in
front of our sight.
After dogs are completely secured, secondary importance should be placed on
solving problems stemmed in the human society, such as denouncing the people
who caused this type of tragedy, and prevention activities.
Punishment to humans can only be made through the legal action.
Our members actually went to court to plead for some action against the
people who were responsible for these dogs.
When people use dogs in their businesses, they start to focus on their own
wealth by sacrificing dogs even if they were originally dog lovers.
Love for the dogs and attachment to them must be similar with us, but such
feelings deteriorate at the moment when they try to use them.
Perhaps the people responsible for this tragedy all forgot what they used to
give to dogs and gain from them.
We are probably too simple-minded.
Just like some animal rescue organization suggested to us, it was better for
us to let the situation go and overlook what is happening to the dogs.
Maybe it was better if we let the dogs pass away like they actually do.
No responsibility was placed upon us if we did not get involved.
If so many dogs die, maybe it was possible to appeal to the society as
sensational news.
We did not have to be criticized for indeed supporting the pet shop and to
be attacked by some of the official organizations.
If we did not know about this, we could just live in the human society as we
usually do.
We could even pretend like we did not see the scene, and spend our usual
life.
Like we actually do now, perhaps it was better if we just continued to take
care of dogs at our expense, not telling anyone else.
If we acted in such a way, nobody made an objection to our activities.
However, these are all caused by the human society.
This might be an anger derived from the value difference of each person.
It may be wrong to protect animals without any direction of the official
organizations.
Perhaps ordinary dog lovers should just keep donating.
Is this a problem, which can be settled by just finding a leader and
accusing that person?
Is denouncing that person the only thing we can do?
What does it mean by passing judgment?
After all, the central problem arises from many elements that revolve around
these dogs. People who incurred loss by cooperating with that leader
incited dog market to take advantage of the trend of pet keeping. Current
official organizations are attacking othersf activities like they will not
allow anybody in their territory. People have hesitant attitude toward the
troublesome issues
All these problems are derived in the human society. Is it unreasonable to
consider dogs as innocent?
They are the silent victims of our countless mistakes.
When ewe are working to improve the situation for these dogs who used to be
somebodyfs property, sometimes I feel like they are not mere silent
victims.
These dogs perhaps wanted to tell something through us.
I keep wondering why they were not helped by official organizations, why the
situation was not so simple, and why it was not open to public.
Why does similar case continues even if there are so many protection
organizations in the society?
The situation can be worse by simplifying the way of living with other life
form, dogs.
On the other hand, being persistent in onefs own way also can create
immoral result.
It is all about the capacity and balance when one becomes stuck with
particular way and starts to attack others.
Such things could happen to anybody.
The project gave me an opportunity to recognize how terrible it is to
involve in marketing, protecting, and managing of dogs.
It is surprising that various benefits and loss are complicated even from
the protectorfs point of view.
However, members are greatly encouraged by the fact known through the site
that there are many people willing to protect dogs with serious concern.
Compare to the past situation of routine work to save dogsf lives, the
environment for dogs dramatically improved due to the cooperation from the
volunteer participants.
There is much less desperate howling in the facility.
Some dogs can sit and wait when a person stands in front of them.
The atmosphere is definitely starting to change with a feeling of ghope.h
Progress of dogs under the foster care is recorded in the journal.
There used to be dogs who are frightened to see people, but the encounter
with trustful human would be a priceless experience for them.
The foster care probably would be much longer than our first expectation.
Many people are involved and their feelings are complicated.
It is expected that we will be attacked and obstructed in many ways because
of the value difference with other organizations.
However, if dogsf lives are its expense, it is our priority to secure and
protect them.
It is an ideal if we could simultaneously accuse somebody responsible for
this situation, but our opinion is that if such accusation activity will
sacrifice dogsf lives, it is not possible to agree on that issue.
Currently our protection is operated solely by our expense because of other
fs accusation that our activity is defending the pet shop.
Because none of the accusing organizations have set up a message board for
general public, we considered to implement a message board in our website.
We would like to respond and clear any doubts from public as much as
possible.
Even when in a delicate situation, we will try to publicize any information
that is hard to be open.
The person who should be accused unconcernedly ignores the memorandum for
closing the shop.
After the memorandum was presented, he said to a person who visited the
shop, g We are only closing for redecoration of the shop. It is bothering
if some strange rumor spreads around.h
(Also, according to the information given today, 19th, one of the two
employees was given a sole responsibility and shop opened again. A person
who used to be in charge was dismissed. We have to come up with some other
way again to prevent them from the similar tragedy.)
Decision depends on each one of you.
We are not an official protection organization.
Donated money is not used for our living expense.
In the case of raising contributions in the future, we will use an
intermediary function to make all the donations open and aboveboard.
There is an apprehension about member going bankrupt based on the current
situation.
Some members are already in debt.
I would like you to consider what it takes to commit oneself to protection
full-time at onefs own expense.
It is really grateful that we have many fellow members who try to achieve
our goal together and are trustful.
Number of members is increasing by actually visiting the site and watching
our activities.
Although some organizations including major ones keep silent to avoid
interruption, they are secretly supporting us behind the scene.
When I consider about protection, it is an ideal form to find what one can
do and act in order to achieve the same objective with others instead of
relying everything onto one.
Possibility is infinite: social punishment to the leader of this tragedy,
applying for permanent home or foster care, signing for the legal accusation
of them, applying for volunteering, spreading the case to the public,
educating the way of living together with dogs in the society, studying dogs
f mode of life, donating supply needed. They might overlap each other.
Please reconsider what you can do now and in the future to make the ideal
society to live with dogs.
Save the ex-event dogs! Project team member,@Yuri Inoue |